News - Latest update published of Whistleblowing: Law and Practice

Employment & Discrimination - Jack Mitchell

An update to Whistleblowing: Law and Practice (OUP) 2017, brought up to date to 14 May 2020, has been published here.

Co-authored by Jeremy Lewis, John Bowers QC, Martin Fodder and Old Square’s Jack Mitchell and at nearly 200 pages, it is comprehensive.

Important legislation analysed: including Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, with a detailed comparison of that forthcoming protection with the current law in England and Wales.

Some of the many issues addressed include:

  • Is there a new whistleblower tort following Rihan v Ernst & Young Global Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 901 (QB).
  • Pre-employment protection considering the ET case of Bilsbrough v Berry Marketing Services Ltd Case No. 1401692/2018, 5th July 2019.
  • The rights of those contributing to or being associated to a disclosure following the ET case of Aston and others v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police Case No. 2402963/2017, 31st May 2019.
  • The aggregation of disclosures, following Elysium Healthcare No.2 Ltd v Ogunlami [2019] UKEAT 0116/18/RN, 12th February 2019;  Robinson v His Highness Sheikh Khalid Bin- Saqr Al Qasmi [2020] IRLR 345 (EAT) and Choudhury P in Simpson v Cantor Fitzgerald Europe [2020] ICR 236 (EAT).
  • Reasonable belief, with consideration of Bassnett v Nutriculture UK Ltd ET Case No. 2405266/2018, 23rd May 2019 ; Mr N Williams v  Michelle Brown AM  UKEAT/0044/19/OO, 29th October 2019 ; Simpson v Cantor Fitzgerald Europe [2020] ICR 236 (EAT).
  • Knowledge of the recipient following Young v Brit College Ltd Case No. 3201701/2019, 5th August 2019 and The Office for Gas and Electricity Markets v Pytel [2019] ICR 715 (EAT).
  • Public interest, building upon Chesterton, examining cases such as  ABC & others v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 2329, [2019] 2 All E.R. 684, Parsons v Airplus International Ltd UKEAT/0111/17/JOJ, 13th October 2017 ; Malik v Cenkos Securities Plc UKEAT/0100/17/RN, 17th January 2018 and Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd UKEAT/0105/18/BA, 13th September 2018; [2019] EWCA Civ 2007, [2020] IRLR 224 (CA).
  • Section 43G and separability following Jesudason v Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0248/16/LA, 29th June 2018; [2020] EWCA Civ 73.
  • Workers following Uber B.V.  and others v Aslam and others  [2019] IRLR 257 (CA) building upon McTigue and Day, but also the wider implications from Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44; [2019] 1 WLR 5905 reversing [2017] EWCA Civ 2220, [2018] ICR 827 and the application of Convention Rights more broadly for whistleblower.
  • Territorial reach following British Council v Jeffery; Green v SIG Trading Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2253, [2019] ICR 929 (CA).
  • Claims against co-workers, building upon Oispov including Bamieh v (1) Eulex Kosovo (2) Foreign & Commonwealth Office (3) Mr G Meucci (5) Ms C Fearon (6) Mr J Ratel  UKEAT/0268/16/RN, 19th January 2018 and Jeffery v British Council [2019] ICR 929 (CA).
  • The implications of an investigation into whistleblower’s concerns following Quarm v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis  UKEAT 0200/18/LA, 22nd  May 2019.
  • The full analysis of tainted information and manipulation with the reach of Royal Mail Group Ltd  v Jhuti [2019] UKSC 55 fully considered, including how tainted information was applied in Chumber v Hestia Healthcare Limited UKEAT/0229/18/LA, 22nd February 2019 (before the Supreme Court’s judgment) and in Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh [2020] IRLR 86 (EAT) and Uddin v London Borough Of Ealing [2020] UKEAT 0165/0165/19/RN (both decided after the Supreme Court).
  • Interim relief is brought up to date including consideration of Hancock v Ter-Berg & Anor [2019] UKEAT 0138_19_2507 (25th July 2019) and Sheikh Khalid Bin Saqr Al Qasimi v Robinson [2020] IRLR 345.
  • Non-disclosure, and non-disparaging agreements are considered, including the balance between confidentiality and public interest following Saab v Dangate Consulting Ltd and others [2019] PNLR 29, Pharmagona v Taheri and Mohammadi [2020] EWHC 312 (QB) and Pertemps Medical Group Ltd v Ladak [2020] EWHC 163 (QB).
  • Remedies following Gibson v (1) Hounslow LBC and (2) Crane Park Primary School UKEAT/0033/18/BA.
About cookies on our website

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)